">
Home
Oct 7, 2017 Employment Explosion
June 26, 2017 Why's the FED Panicking?
May 25, 2017 LFPR anyone?
Apr 26, 2017 What's up with the FED?
March 10, 2017 Feb Employment Situation
Oct 10, 2016 Tax Burden
Aug 1, 2016 Here Comes the Debt
June 26, 2016 Moribund US Economy
June 16 2016 Labor Update
Mar 10, 2016 Spring Renewal for Labor Markets?
Feb 21, 2016 GDP Gap
Feb 16, 2016 FED and Monetary Policy
Jan 19, 2016 Employment Gap Age Groups LFPR
Jan 10, 2016 A look at the Employment Situation
Dec 30, 2015 Fed Funds Rate up 25 Basis points...so what?
Dec 15, 2015 Fed Funds on the rise? Has Yellen 'Fell-in'?
Oct 15, 2015 Labor Markets Seven years of misery
Oct 6, 2015 Sept: Horrible Month for Labor
Sept 30, 2015 The FED: Interest Rate Angst
Sept 11, 2015 FED on the Monetary Policy Front
July 31, 2015 Trade and Foreign Exchange Rates
July 20, 2015 Economic Growth?
July 10, 2015 Labor Picture by Age Group
July 2, 2015 Disastrous Month in Labor Rpt
June 19, 2015 Minimum Wage - Income Distribution
Jun 5, 2015 Encouraged Worker Effect
May 8, 2015 Updated Employment Situation for April
May 4, 2015 Languishing Labor Markets
Apr 7, 2015 LFPR Doldrums on the Labor Front
March 8, 2015 Less than Zero Interest Rates - Trade War
2014 Articles
2013 Articles
2012 Articles
2011 & 2010 Articles
Dec 23, 2011 Revisionist History Depression
Dec 10, 2011 Depression & Now Part 1
Dec 5, 2011 Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics
Nov 16, 2011 Taxes Part 2
Nov 8, 2011 Taxes Pt 1
Nov 1, 2011 Demographics
Oct 12, 2011 Fed-FOMC
Oct 6, 2011 Fed's Operation Twist
Sep 30, 2011 What Price Bailouts?!
Sep 9, 2011 Trade Deficit - States
Sept 3, 2011 Unemployment Ongoing Challenge
August 22, 2011 Restricting Oil Supply
August 11, 2011 Credit Rating-Taxes
August 8, 2011 QE3? What to do?
Aug 5, 2011 Employment Update
August 1, 2011 Competitive Free Mkt Capitalism
July 26, 2011 Cradle of Democracy
July 16, 2011 Capital Ratios
July 10, 2011 Unemployment Again
July 1, 2011 QE2 Over-Apres Moi, le Deluge
June 11, 2011 Unemployment
June 8, 2011 Net Worth Collapse
May 18 2011 Credit Collapse '08-'10
May 15, 2011 Fed Miracle-Mayhem
May 10, 2011 Unemployment
Mar 30, 2011 Puppet Show
Mar 18, 2011 Locked-in-Effect
Mar 10, 2011 Bummer Days
Feb 12 2011 Inflation by Decontenting
Feb 6 2011 Unemployment
Jan 14 2011 Money Supply
Jan 12 2011 Trade Deficit
Jan 6 2011 Printing Press Myth
Dec 18, 2010 College Pricing
Dec 7 2010 Debt & Deficits
Dec 2, 2010 J-Laffer Curve
Sep 24 2010 Competition
Sept 23 2010 Trade Deficit China
Introduction
About us
Links of Interest
Straw Poll
Definitions & Miscellaneous
 

2011 Volume Issue 10


Economic Newsletter for the New Millennium
 

December 5, 2011
 

Editor
Donald R. Byrne, Ph.D.
dbyrne5628@aol.com  


Associate Editor
Edward T. Derbin, MA, MBA
edtitan@aol.com  

For a downloadable version, click here

SortingOutNovEmploymentRpt12-5-11.pdf



Lies, Damned lies, and Statistics

…etched on Hadrian’s Wall by a frustrated and anonymous Roman Centurion (speculative)…also attributed to the likes of Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister, Mark Twain, and Harry S Truman, president of U.S. of A.


In the most recent employment report by the BLS, it appears that the employment and unemployment pictures have appreciably improved.  That is NOT the case when the details are examined.   Since the peak of economic activity under the Clinton Administration when the participation rate averaged 67.1% (from April 1996 through March 2001), that rate has been trending downward.   The very large build up of federal government tax revenues as a result of significant tax increases during the Rubinomics period of Clinton’s second term, led to a sharp collapse in GDP during 2000, President Clinton’s last year. This decline in the participation rates has biased downward the calculation in arriving at the unemployment rates.  

 

Economic Newsletter for the New Millennium

August 11, 2011


http://econnewsletter.com/84401.html  

 
Clinton Tax Hike

“When Clinton became President in 1993, he inherited an annual federal deficit of $290 billion (1992) and a U-3 unemployment rate of 7.5% (1992).  In 1995, he appointed Robert Rubin as Secretary of the Treasury (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubinomics).  He and President Clinton lobbied Congress to dedicate the higher taxes legislated in 1993 toward reducing the federal deficit and they agreed with him.” 




Collapsing GDP 2000.jpg

 


THE STEADY DECLINE IN THE PARTICIPATION RATE AS THE JOBS OUTLOOK DARKENED

The major cause of this decline in the participation rate has been the discouraged worker effect exacerbated by an unprecedented duration of unemployment.  Spikes in the early retirement rate and the permanent disability rate have also added to this decline.



Not in Labor Force - not disabled.jpg




Duration of Unemployment.jpg



Examples of reduction in the Labor Force



New Awards to Workers Social Security and Disability.jpg




OASDI Beneficiary Stats.jpg



How are the participation rate and the various elements of the unemployment rate determined along with the definition of the terms used in arriving at these various rates?


-------------------------------------------------------

The following are various measures used in determining employment statistics as used by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (Current Population Survey)

http://www.bls.gov/lau/rdscnp16.htm#defs  
 

Civilian Non-institutional Population

The civilian non-institutional population consists of persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 States and the District of Columbia who are not inmates of institutions (for example, penal and mental facilities and homes for the aged) and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.

 

Employment

Employment consists of all persons who, during the reference week (the calendar week including the twelfth day of the month), (a) did any work at all (at least 1 hour) as paid employees, worked in their own business or profession or on their own farm, or worked 15 hours or more as unpaid workers in an enterprise operated by a member of the family, or (b) were not working but had jobs or businesses from which they were temporarily absent because of vacation, illness, bad weather, childcare problems, maternity or paternity leave, labor-management dispute, job training, or other family or personal reasons, whether or not they were paid for the time off or were seeking other jobs.

 

Unemployment

Unemployment consists of all persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

 

Employment-Population Ratio

Employment-population ratio is the proportion of the civilian noninstitutional population aged 16 years and over that is employed.

 

Civilian Labor Force

The civilian labor force consists of all persons classified as employed or unemployed as described above.

 

Labor force Participation Rate

The labor force participation rate represents the proportion of the civilian noninstitutional population that is in the labor force. This measure of labor force activity grew from about 60 percent nationally in 1970 to about 67 percent in 2000, with much of the increase resulting from increased participation by women.

 

Unemployment Rate

The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed as a percent of the civilian labor force. Unemployment rates move inversely with the business cycle, sometimes with a lag.

 

U-3 (Official Unemployment Rate)

U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)

 
U-6 (Alternative – [more precise/complex] unemployment rate)

U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

 

Various measures of unemployment rate

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm  

 



Alternate Measures of Unemployment (U-3 and U-6).jpg


-------------------------------------------------------------


…an alternative to the U-3 and U-6 measurements --- adjusting for a more realistic Labor Force Participation Rate


Participation rate adjustment for U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rates

From April 1996 through March 2001, the average Labor Force Participation Rate was 67.1%.  In our presentation, we adjusted the reported rates to reflect the 67.1% to identify the discouraged workers who have entirely given up any hope of gaining employment.  When you experience lengthy bouts of unemployment, the discouraged worker effect is amplified, beyond even the normal levels when shorter term unemployment cycles occur.

CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONAL POPULATION

Since January 2001, the Civilian Noninstitutional Population [those 16 and older, not in the military or in institutions (for example, penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged)] has grown by around 200,000 per month.
 

CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONAL POPULATION

January 2001 = 213,888,000

November 2011 = 240,441,000

Difference = 26,553,000 / 131 months = 204,000 / month

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months 

December 2007 = 233,156,000

June 2009 = 235,655,000

Difference = 2,499,000 / 19 months = 131,526 / month

 

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 213,888,000

January 2009 = 234,739,000

Difference = 20,851,000 / 97 months = 214,959 / month

 


During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 234,739,000

November 2011 = 240,441,000

Difference = 5,702,000 / 35 months = 162,914 / month


 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 235,655,000

November 2011 = 240,441,000

Difference = 4,786,000 / 30 months = 159,533 / month

 
Clearly, the decline in the labor force  participation was a result of the slower rate of economic activity and since it is the denominator of the calculation of the unemployment rate, that rate was biased downward and not a realistic measure of the unemployment rate picture and hence the need for an adjustment.




Civilian Noninstitutional Population.jpg


LABOR FORCE


Since January 2001, the Labor Force (a subset of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population, labeled as employed or unemployed) has only grown by around 77,000 per month.

 

LABOR FORCE

January 2001 = 143,800,000

November 2011 = 153,883,000

Difference = 10,083,000 / 131 months = 77,000/month

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months  

December 2007 = 153,936,000

June 2009 = 154,754,000

Difference = 818,000 / 19 months = 43,053 / month

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 143,800,000

January 2009 = 154,185,000

Difference = 20,851,000 / 97 months = 107,062 / month

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 154,185,000

November 2011 = 153,883,000

Difference = (302,000) / 35 months = (8,629) / month

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months


June 2009 = 154,754,000

November 2011 = 153,883,000

Difference = (871,000) / 30 months = (29,033) / month


 

Civlian Labor Force.jpg


Labor Force Participation Rate


From January 2001 through November 2011, the Labor Force Participation Rate (The Labor Force as a percent of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population) grew by around 56,000 per month.

 

Labor Force Participation Rate

January 2001 = 67.2%

November 2011 = 64.0%

Difference = -3.2%

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 66.0%

June 2009 = 65.7%

Difference = -0.3%

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 67.2%

January 2009 = 65.7%

Difference = -1.5%

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 65.7%

November 2011 = 64.0%

Difference = -1.7%

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 65.7%

November 2011 = 64.0%

Difference = -1.7%




Labor Force Participation Rate.jpg


Employed


From January 2001 through November 2011, the Employed Persons (a subset of the Labor Force) grew by around 21,000 per month.


Employed

January 2001 = 137,778,000

November 2011 = 140,580,000

Difference = 2,802,000 / 131 months = 21,389 / month

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 146,272,000

June 2009 = 139,978,000

Difference = (6,294,000) / 19 months = (331,263) / month

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 137,778,000

January 2009 = 142,201,000

Difference = 4,423,000 / 97 months = 45,598 / month

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 142,201,000

November 2011 = 140,580,000

Difference = (1,621,000) / 35 months = (46,314) / month

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 139,978,000

November 2011 = 140,580,000

Difference = 602,000 / 30 months = 20,067 / month




Employed.jpg


Unemployed


From January 2001 through November 2011, the Unemployed Persons (a subset of the Labor Force) grew by around 56,000 per month.

 
Unemployed

January 2001 = 6,023,000

November 2011 = 13,303,000

Difference = 7,280,000 / 131 months = 55,573 / month

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 7,664,000

June 2009 = 14,776,000

Difference = 7,112,000 / 19 months = 374,316 / month

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 6,023,000

January 2009 = 7,664,000

Difference = 1,641,000 / 97 months = 16,918 / month

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 11,984,000

November 2011 = 13,303,000

Difference = 1,319,000 / 35 months = 37,686 / month

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 14,776,000

November 2011 = 13,303,000

Difference = (1,473,000) / 30 months = (49,100) / month




Unemployed.jpg


Unemployment Rate (U-3) Official


From January 2001 through November 2011, the Unemployment Rate (unemployed as a percent of the labor force.) went from 4.2 to 8.6%.

 

Unemployment Rate (U-3) Official

January 2001 = 4.2%

November 2011 = 8.6%

Difference = 4.4%

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 5.0%

June 2009 = 9.5%

Difference = 4.5%

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 4.2%

January 2009 = 7.8%

Difference = 3.6%

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 7.8%

November 2011 = 8.6%

Difference = 0.8%

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 9.5%

November 2011 = 8.6%

Difference = -0.9%




U-3 Unemployment Rate.jpg



 
Adjusting to reflect Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.1% 

Note: from April 1996 – March 2001, the average Labor Force Participation Rate was 67.1%) 

Unemployment Rate (U-3) Official – again, adjusting to reflect Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.1%


From January 2001 through November 2011, the adjusted Unemployment Rate (unemployed as a percent of the labor force.) went from 4.2 to 13.3%.
 

Adjusted U-3 Unemployment Rate

January 2001 = 4.2%

November 2011 = 13.3%

Difference = 9.1%

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 6.5%

June 2009 = 11.6%

Difference = 5.1%

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 4.2%

January 2009 = 9.8%

Difference = 5.6%

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 9.8%

November 2011 = 13.3%

Difference = 3.5%

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 11.6%

November 2011 = 13.3%

Difference = 1.7%  




U-3 Unemployment Rate - Adjusted for Labor Force Participation Rate.jpg


Unemployment Rate (U-6) Official


From January 2001 through November 2011, the U-6 Unemployment Rate (Alternative measures of labor underutilization = Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force) went from 7.3 to 15.6%.


Unemployment Rate (U-6) Official

January 2001 = 7.3%

November 2011 = 15.6%

Difference = 8.3%

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 8.8%

June 2009 = 16.6%

Difference = 7.8%

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, added January 2009)

January 2001 = 7.3%

January 2009 = 14.1%

Difference = 6.8%

 

During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 14.1%

November 2011 = 15.6%

Difference = 1.5%

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 16.6%

November 2011 = 15.6%

Difference = -1.0%



U-6 Unemployment Rate.jpg



Adjusting to reflect Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.1%
 
Note: from April 1996 – March 2001, the average Labor Force Participation Rate was 67.1%) 
 
Unemployment Rate (U-6) Alternative measures of labor underutilization – again, adjusting to reflect Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.1%


From January 2001 through November 2011, the adjusted U-6 Unemployment Rate (Alternative measures of labor underutilization = Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force) went from 7.3 to 20.6%.

 

Adjusted U-6 Unemployment Rate

January 2001 = 7.3%

November 2011 = 20.3%

Difference = 13.0%

 

During the Great Recession – 19 months

December 2007 = 10.3%

June 2009 = 18.6%

Difference = 8.3%

 

During Bush Presidency – 97 months (actually 96 months, included January 2009)

January 2001 = 7.3%

January 2009 = 16.1%

Difference = 8.8%

 
During Obama Presidency – 35 months

January 2009 = 16.1%

November 2011 = 20.3%

Difference = 4.2%

 

End of the Recession (June 2009) to November 2011 – 30 months

June 2009 = 18.6%

November 2011 = 20.3%

Difference = 1.7%





U-6 Unemployment Rate Adjusted.jpg


...again, the employment-population ratio is the proportion of the civilian noninstitutional population aged 16 years and over that is employed.  It further illustrates how extensive the employment problem really is.



Civilian Employment-Population Ratio.jpg



One last example of shrinkage in the Civilian Noninstitutional Population

U.S. Department of Justice - In 2009, over 7.2 million people were under some form of correctional supervision

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys (The Annual Probation Survey, National Prisoner Statistics Program, Annual Survey of Jails, and Annual Parole Survey)

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/glance/corr2.cfm



Correctional Population 1980-2009.jpg
 


More to follow...